I am not going to suggest that 9/11 was perpetrated by alien ETs, or the U.S. government in collusion with such entities. Nor that the supernatural played any role in that horrific orchestration with its world-wide ramifications, still unfolding as I write. No, but I will propose the perpetrators of that event employed the technological equivalent of supernatural power to pull it off. The admission that such technological magic exists for use against the general public in a “psy ops” or mind control operation, combined with overwhelming lethal firepower (“shock and awe”) is crucial to the liberating view that opens for humanity if and when it can really solve the events of September 11, 2001.

No Planes

So what is the “9/11 Solution”? It is the clear, rational explanation of HOW the attacks of 9/11 were accomplished. Not WHY that horror was committed, or WHO committed it, but HOW. To sort through the morass of 9/11 “conspiracy theories” — a derogatory term used to dismiss genuine inquiry and dodge the questions it raises — requires separating these three, three-letter questions: HOW? WHO? WHY? An uncountable number of theories have been advanced, mixing the three questions. A dia-Gnostic approach separates these questions on the basis of a single determinative issue: What do we have to see first, to see the way to the correct explanation of 9/11? In the telestic idiom of aim and purposes, which question leads the inquiry to its goal? Which question, once answered, opens the way to answering the other two?

The dismissive term “conspiracy buffs” describes, in many but not all cases, genuine investigators. Those who investigate are not without their agendas and biases, and not, in the worse cases, without disinfo motives. The official version (read: cover story) for 9/11 is absurd, full of holes and contradictions. But some conspiracy theories are equally absurd, preposterous, not grounded in evidence. How, then, to sort through this morass of fantasy, confusion, and speculation?

The 9/11 Solution leads all other inquiries with the question of HOW.

Of all the theories proposed, I submit that the superior explanation of 9/11 is the one that refers to common sense and applies laws of nature, in particular, Newtonian physics. This explanation will also be the one that integrates closely with inquiries into WHO did it and WHY, and sets the stage for those inquiries. In other words, scientific evidence provides the basis for a deeper motivational analysis of the event. Also, a point of signal importance: the rational explanation reveals how it could NOT have been done. That is, precisely how the official version of events does not and cannot stand against the laws of nature.

I refer to the official explanation of all four events: the two attacks on the Twin Towers, the attack on the Pentagon, and the crash in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Designated by flights, these events involved

American Airlines Flight 11 from Boston to Los Angeles

United Airlines Flight 175 from Boston to Los Angeles

American Airlines Flight 77 from Dulles to Los Angeles

United Airlines Flight 93 from Newark to San Francisco

Flights 11 and 175 are associated with the Twin Towers attacks, Flight 77 with the Pentagon, and Flight 92 with the Shanksville crash. I say “associated” because 9/11 Solution asserts that no planes, i.e., ordinary passenger airliners, were involved in any of these incidents. 9/11 “no planers” have been widely ridiculed, of course. Of the countless conspiracy theories, the no plane theory seems to be patently ridiculous. After all, did not the entire world see the planes hit those towers? And were not those crashes recorded by many witnesses, thus offering video evidence of real-life events?

The 9/11 Solution states: the witnessed and recorded events of that day were accomplished without using the passenger jets associated with them. Does this explanation look totally ludicrous? Before rejecting it out of hand as irrational, consider these clear, pertinent, and inescapably rational questions:

What to make of the numerous eye-witness statements that the attacking objects were not airline passenger jets? Did not appear to have windows? Did not make the usual sound? Did not even look like normal airlines?

What to make of the numerous expert testimony of pilots that such aircraft could not have been flown in that manner, at that speed and altitude, not even skilled professionals and certainly not by amateur trainees?

What to make of the flagrant inconsistency between the official explanation, asserting that jetliners were used, and the physical evidence showing that jetliners could not have accomplished the damage evident at each location? For instance, that jet fuel does not burn at the temperature that can melt steel columns? That the floors collapsing in the way supposed would have slowed down and stacked into a pile of layered rubble, rather than disintegrated to dust at they descended at free-fall speed? That the damage at the Pentagon is inconsistent with the size and impact of a jetliner? That no wreckage, baggage, or bodies were found at the Shanksville site?

What to make of the violation of the laws of physics exhibited by the objects that crashed into the Twin Towers: no deceleration upon impact, no crunching of the hollow metallic cocoons into their own length, no shattering of debris on the site?

All of these questions arise from common sense and basic knowledge of the laws of physics possessed by a high-school teenager. All of these questions are consistently answered in the 9/11 Solution: the events of that day involved remote-controlled CGI-cloaked missiles, that is, military aircraft holographically disguised as airliners. No planes were used on that day. This is the 9/11 Solution. Wild and ludicrous as it may appear, this is the single, inclusive explanation that most conforms to scientific analysis of the evidence. It is a definitive answer to HOW the events of 9/11 were done.

internet site reference: LINK